New: two-way text chat — quiet operator ↔ employee guidance, on record
DaitchLens vs. surveillance-ware

The consent-first alternative

The same real-time visibility, recording, and control the stealth trackers sell — rebuilt so your team can see it, consent to it, and stand behind it. Here's exactly how it differs, and what it costs.

The consent-first difference

Everything the surveillance tools do — without the surveillance

The same real-time visibility, recording, and control the stealth trackers sell — rebuilt so your team can see it, consent to it, and stand behind it.

Employee awareness
DaitchLensDisclosed by design — a persistent on-screen indicator on every live session.
Stealth-first toolsCovert by default, with a stealth agent employees are never meant to see.
Consent model
DaitchLensOwner policy AND employee consent, combined server-side and re-checked live.
Stealth-first toolsInstalled once — employees get no say and nothing to agree to.
Microphone access
DaitchLensTriple-gated, employee-joined, with a live-mic indicator on the whole time.
Stealth-first toolsSilent microphone capture, often with no indicator at all.
Webcam, clipboard & files
DaitchLensDeliberately excluded — no covert webcam, clipboard scraping, or file transfer.
Stealth-first toolsHidden webcam snapshots, clipboard logging, and covert file exfiltration.
Operator accountability
DaitchLensA tamper-evident audit trail records who watched, controlled, or recorded.
Stealth-first toolsLittle or no record of who accessed what — the watchers go unwatched.
Withdrawing consent
DaitchLensEmployees revoke anytime and capture stops mid-session, the instant it happens.
Stealth-first toolsNothing to withdraw from something you were never told about.
Legal & works-council posture
DaitchLensBuilt for GDPR-style transparency — the kind of tool a works council will sign off on.
Stealth-first toolsFrequent legal friction, privacy-law exposure, and employee backlash.
Why the difference matters

Transparency isn't just the right call — it's the cheaper one

Every row in that table maps to a real cost the stealth-first approach quietly runs up.

Lower attrition, not higher

Covert surveillance is one of the fastest ways to torch morale and drive turnover — brutal in industries like BPO where it's already high. Monitoring people can see, and consent to, doesn't carry that cost.

Fewer legal landmines

Stealth capture, hidden webcam and mic access, and clipboard scraping are exactly what collide with GDPR-style privacy law and works councils. Leaving them out by design removes a whole category of exposure.

Evidence that actually holds up

A screenshot with no chain of custody doesn't survive a dispute. Documented consent plus a tamper-evident, append-only audit trail gives compliance and HR a record they can defend.

A tool teams adopt

The best monitoring is the kind people don't fight. When employees have their own portal, see what's enabled, and hold the switch to withdraw, oversight reads as a tool — not a tracker.

Pricing FAQ

Plans & pricing, in plain English

Per-seat pricing, what's in each tier, and how it stacks up against the stealth-first tools.

Still have questions?

Our team is here to help — get in touch and we'll answer anything you need.

See it for yourself

Compare it live, on your own setup

Book a walkthrough and we'll show you consent-first monitoring end to end — and answer anything on plans, seats, or deployment.